<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cooker Interface Redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/</link>
	<description>Hypertext rulez™</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>bojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>@marko: naaah, you've only made me think about it all a bit. Maybe I'll mention you here or there.. Or somewhere :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@marko: naaah, you&#8217;ve only made me think about it all a bit. Maybe I&#8217;ll mention you here or there.. Or somewhere :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 10:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>@zyt: I like arrows, but wait... aren&#8217;t those bojan&#8217;s? : )

@bojan: &#8220;Or better yet, print a bunch and make some money ;)&#8221;... and pay me percentage for the rest of our lives : )

@dusoft: Security measures are adding more thoughts to consider when designing this interface. So, perhaps this linear arrows are not enough?

@emti: You just can&#8217;t do anything seriously, don&#8217;t you? : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@zyt: I like arrows, but wait&#8230; aren&#8217;t those bojan&#8217;s? : )</p>
<p>@bojan: &#8220;Or better yet, print a bunch and make some money ;)&#8221;&#8230; and pay me percentage for the rest of our lives : )</p>
<p>@dusoft: Security measures are adding more thoughts to consider when designing this interface. So, perhaps this linear arrows are not enough?</p>
<p>@emti: You just can&#8217;t do anything seriously, don&#8217;t you? : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emptyhead</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>emptyhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-306</guid>
		<description>my stowe looks like this...

&lt;img src="http://emptyhead.burza.hr/coocker.jpg" alt="" /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my stowe looks like this&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://emptyhead.burza.hr/coocker.jpg" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>bojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>This experiment is cool. I just might print some stickers and put them on my stove :) Or better yet, print a bunch and make some money ;)

Seriously, this is one of those things that obviously hasn't been given enough attention. Why on earth don't they make it more simple? Another thing comes to mind, regarding 'making it simple'.  It's those damn forms you have to fill out at the post office (here in Croatia), when sending packages. Those forms are so tough to understand if you're filling them out for the first time! Tiny letters, tiny format design, enclear instructions... Keep it simple, for crying out loud! 

@zyt: I thought it looked farmiliar :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This experiment is cool. I just might print some stickers and put them on my stove :) Or better yet, print a bunch and make some money ;)</p>
<p>Seriously, this is one of those things that obviously hasn&#8217;t been given enough attention. Why on earth don&#8217;t they make it more simple? Another thing comes to mind, regarding &#8216;making it simple&#8217;.  It&#8217;s those damn forms you have to fill out at the post office (here in Croatia), when sending packages. Those forms are so tough to understand if you&#8217;re filling them out for the first time! Tiny letters, tiny format design, enclear instructions&#8230; Keep it simple, for crying out loud! </p>
<p>@zyt: I thought it looked farmiliar :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusoft</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator>dusoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-296</guid>
		<description>OK, now the big thing: I have checked my stove (it is classic gas-stove with four burners) and remembered this: every stove must have this counter-clockwise knob since this is &lt;strong&gt;very important security measure&lt;/strong&gt;.

Also that means that all the proposed design are lacking secure operation - you must have smaller flame down and not up, the top position must be zero, then followed by the quarter of emptiness (e.g. no gas) and then by the strongest flame slowly passing away to the bottom with the lowest flame possible (from 3 quarters left to bottom left). This guarantees that nobody could leave gas open when moving to ZERO position since the last quarter (top left quarter following the strongest flame) means gas is off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, now the big thing: I have checked my stove (it is classic gas-stove with four burners) and remembered this: every stove must have this counter-clockwise knob since this is <strong>very important security measure</strong>.</p>
<p>Also that means that all the proposed design are lacking secure operation - you must have smaller flame down and not up, the top position must be zero, then followed by the quarter of emptiness (e.g. no gas) and then by the strongest flame slowly passing away to the bottom with the lowest flame possible (from 3 quarters left to bottom left). This guarantees that nobody could leave gas open when moving to ZERO position since the last quarter (top left quarter following the strongest flame) means gas is off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zytzagoo</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>zytzagoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-295</guid>
		<description>OK, here's my go at this:
Since there are only two burners, and as you said, the larger is behind the smaller one, I think there's no need to bring the confusion about which is which. Why not simply indicate the bigger one and the smaller one?

Add to that a simple "off indicator", and I think it should be quite usable : )
&lt;img src="http://gamer.vip.hr/cooker_exercise_zyt.gif" /&gt;
P.S.
The arrow icons are "stolen" from bojan's version, hope he doesn't mind : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, here&#8217;s my go at this:<br />
Since there are only two burners, and as you said, the larger is behind the smaller one, I think there&#8217;s no need to bring the confusion about which is which. Why not simply indicate the bigger one and the smaller one?</p>
<p>Add to that a simple &#8220;off indicator&#8221;, and I think it should be quite usable : )<br />
<img src="http://gamer.vip.hr/cooker_exercise_zyt.gif" /><br />
P.S.<br />
The arrow icons are &#8220;stolen&#8221; from bojan&#8217;s version, hope he doesn&#8217;t mind : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusoft</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>dusoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>OK, brainstroming and adding another try:
&lt;img src="http://www.ambience.sk/experiments/cooker_dusoft2.png" alt="" /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, brainstroming and adding another try:<br />
<img src="http://www.ambience.sk/experiments/cooker_dusoft2.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusoft</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>dusoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-293</guid>
		<description>bojan: I somehow forgot about the line showing where the knob is turned. I should remember not working during late night....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bojan: I somehow forgot about the line showing where the knob is turned. I should remember not working during late night&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>bojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Here's what I came up with:
&lt;img src="http://yesterdayishere.com/misc/mycooker.jpg" alt="my version of the cooker" /&gt;

The symbols above the switchers should make it clear... It'd be much easier if there were ie 4 burners, of course. This way, you must make it absolutely clear which is which - I've done that by making one symbol larger than the other. 

The switchers IMO must have 2 things - a line, as I illustrated, which tells you exactly where the switcher is moved, and an arrow or any other symbol that clearly indicates in which direction you should move it. 

My stove also has awful 'user interface'. I've been using it for several years and still have to think what is where. Instead of making it more simple, they complicate it. Amazing. 

It'd be great if the symbols were made in such way that you could feel them under your fingers, that would make them even more easy to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I came up with:<br />
<img src="http://yesterdayishere.com/misc/mycooker.jpg" alt="my version of the cooker" /></p>
<p>The symbols above the switchers should make it clear&#8230; It&#8217;d be much easier if there were ie 4 burners, of course. This way, you must make it absolutely clear which is which - I&#8217;ve done that by making one symbol larger than the other. </p>
<p>The switchers IMO must have 2 things - a line, as I illustrated, which tells you exactly where the switcher is moved, and an arrow or any other symbol that clearly indicates in which direction you should move it. </p>
<p>My stove also has awful &#8216;user interface&#8217;. I&#8217;ve been using it for several years and still have to think what is where. Instead of making it more simple, they complicate it. Amazing. </p>
<p>It&#8217;d be great if the symbols were made in such way that you could feel them under your fingers, that would make them even more easy to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-291</guid>
		<description>Sorry, i forgot to enable images : ) Now it&#8217;s fixed.

You&#8217;re right&#8212;it is a bit unnatural. For example, volume control on my stereo has positive action in clockwise direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, i forgot to enable images : ) Now it&#8217;s fixed.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right&#8212;it is a bit unnatural. For example, volume control on my stereo has positive action in clockwise direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusoft</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>dusoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/02/27/cooker-interface-redesign/#comment-288</guid>
		<description>What about this?
&lt;img src="http://www.ambience.sk/experiments/cooker_dusoft.png" alt="" /&gt;

But I think it's bit illogical due to the nature of  alphabet and left-right way. I think the rotation should be other way round if trying to be more cooker-friendly. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about this?<br />
<img src="http://www.ambience.sk/experiments/cooker_dusoft.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>But I think it&#8217;s bit illogical due to the nature of  alphabet and left-right way. I think the rotation should be other way round if trying to be more cooker-friendly. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
