<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Wishes For Next Safari Build</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/06/20/a-few-wishes-for-next-safari-build/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/06/20/a-few-wishes-for-next-safari-build/</link>
	<description>Hypertext rulez™</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Pomeroy</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/06/20/a-few-wishes-for-next-safari-build/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Pomeroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/06/20/a-few-wishes-for-next-safari-build/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>The latest updates on Safari (1.3 v312 and 2.0 v412) introduced a lot of nice css fixes, but also a few problems. What was a rather well documented/tested way of putting a drop shodow on an image &lt;a href="http://wubbleyew.com/tests/dropshadows.htm"&gt;no longer works&lt;/a&gt; in either version. The right edges of the shadow is about 6 px too far to the right. The same technique, though, seems to work on text blocks.

On 1.3 (but not 2.0) there's also a strange set of problems with &lt;a href="http://www.htmldog.com/articles/elasticdesign/demo/"&gt;elastic images&lt;/a&gt; (image sizes specified in em's). On the first image on the linked-to page, bumb the text size up and down and notice how the image tiles from the lower-left corner. The image is supposed to stretch and shrink with the text size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest updates on Safari (1.3 v312 and 2.0 v412) introduced a lot of nice css fixes, but also a few problems. What was a rather well documented/tested way of putting a drop shodow on an image <a href="http://wubbleyew.com/tests/dropshadows.htm">no longer works</a> in either version. The right edges of the shadow is about 6 px too far to the right. The same technique, though, seems to work on text blocks.</p>
<p>On 1.3 (but not 2.0) there&#8217;s also a strange set of problems with <a href="http://www.htmldog.com/articles/elasticdesign/demo/">elastic images</a> (image sizes specified in em&#8217;s). On the first image on the linked-to page, bumb the text size up and down and notice how the image tiles from the lower-left corner. The image is supposed to stretch and shrink with the text size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin P</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/06/20/a-few-wishes-for-next-safari-build/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2005/06/20/a-few-wishes-for-next-safari-build/#comment-646</guid>
		<description>I have learned to be very diligent about specifying widths on my floated elements. This isn't so much an issue with Safari as it is a poor implementation of the spec with regard to all other browsers.

Lesson learned: If you use floats, make sure to check how they look in Safari because you may be suprised to see a floated element appearing further down the page (because it doesn't have a width, and is given a default 100% width which causes a "clear") than you expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have learned to be very diligent about specifying widths on my floated elements. This isn&#8217;t so much an issue with Safari as it is a poor implementation of the spec with regard to all other browsers.</p>
<p>Lesson learned: If you use floats, make sure to check how they look in Safari because you may be suprised to see a floated element appearing further down the page (because it doesn&#8217;t have a width, and is given a default 100% width which causes a &#8220;clear&#8221;) than you expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
