<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Typetester has the base font size option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/</link>
	<description>Hypertext rulez™</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>Ahh, I thought I had it wrong :)
How did you learn that, was there an article somewhere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I thought I had it wrong :)<br />
How did you learn that, was there an article somewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>Default font-size in most browsers is 16px, therefore &lt;strong&gt;62.5%&lt;/strong&gt; is nailing it down to 10px (16 × 0.62 = 10).

There&#8217;s however, many designers who still don&#8217;t get it, but IMHO the future is bright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Default font-size in most browsers is 16px, therefore <strong>62.5%</strong> is nailing it down to 10px (16 × 0.62 = 10).</p>
<p>There&#8217;s however, many designers who still don&#8217;t get it, but IMHO the future is bright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Perkins</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2006/01/30/typetester-has-the-base-font-size-option/#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>Ahh, but if you set the base font size to something like 67.5% (I don't remember the exact number), then you can use em sizing to acheive pixel perfect results, at least that's what I've been told. I think I got that from the book Professional CSS, but I searched and searched and couldn't find anything.

67.5% base font. 1em = 10px, 1.2em = 12px, .9em = 9px, etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, but if you set the base font size to something like 67.5% (I don&#8217;t remember the exact number), then you can use em sizing to acheive pixel perfect results, at least that&#8217;s what I&#8217;ve been told. I think I got that from the book Professional CSS, but I searched and searched and couldn&#8217;t find anything.</p>
<p>67.5% base font. 1em = 10px, 1.2em = 12px, .9em = 9px, etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
