<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t create features for yourself.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/</link>
	<description>Hypertext rulez™</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vanja Bertalan (web.burza)</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8380</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanja Bertalan (web.burza)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8380</guid>
		<description>Personas are great although, more often than not, it's enough to bring up the "why exactly are we doing this" question. Once the client gets pushed into direction of thinking about the goals he'd like to achieve, about whether his business would benefit from it, it's much more likely he'd be willing to listen a bit.

At that point you've made it to square one, but it opens up a whole new Pandora's box. By this I mean that you should be prepared for long training sessions with the client explaining in's and out's about how-things-work-on-the-web&#8482;.

That, on the other hand, requires time (yours). And time usually correlates to money (theirs).

How it all rolls out from here on is always uncertain :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personas are great although, more often than not, it&#8217;s enough to bring up the &#8220;why exactly are we doing this&#8221; question. Once the client gets pushed into direction of thinking about the goals he&#8217;d like to achieve, about whether his business would benefit from it, it&#8217;s much more likely he&#8217;d be willing to listen a bit.</p>
<p>At that point you&#8217;ve made it to square one, but it opens up a whole new Pandora&#8217;s box. By this I mean that you should be prepared for long training sessions with the client explaining in&#8217;s and out&#8217;s about how-things-work-on-the-web&#8482;.</p>
<p>That, on the other hand, requires time (yours). And time usually correlates to money (theirs).</p>
<p>How it all rolls out from here on is always uncertain :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8370</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8370</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But his Eureka look was priceless...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
And how many times I&#8217;ve seen those, too. I&#8217;m almost tempted to give such ideas a try just for the sake of the colleague&#8217;s/client&#8217;s enthusiasm. But most of the time &#8212; you simply can&#8217;t sqeeze in 2 extra days for such an experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But his Eureka look was priceless&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>And how many times I&#8217;ve seen those, too. I&#8217;m almost tempted to give such ideas a try just for the sake of the colleague&#8217;s/client&#8217;s enthusiasm. But most of the time &#8212; you simply can&#8217;t sqeeze in 2 extra days for such an experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sinisa Dukaric (digitalvomiting)</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8369</link>
		<dc:creator>Sinisa Dukaric (digitalvomiting)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8369</guid>
		<description>Short and sweet. 

I had a similar case one month ago - it was really wierd to even try to explain why certain feature is not  a good one or unique.

You know which feature that was? Well, client wanted to get an e-mail whenever he recieves an e-mail inside of the webmail site. Quite reduntant.  But his Eureka look was priceless, he saw this one as USP and a cool feature nobody has in webmails.... FTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short and sweet. </p>
<p>I had a similar case one month ago - it was really wierd to even try to explain why certain feature is not  a good one or unique.</p>
<p>You know which feature that was? Well, client wanted to get an e-mail whenever he recieves an e-mail inside of the webmail site. Quite reduntant.  But his Eureka look was priceless, he saw this one as USP and a cool feature nobody has in webmails&#8230;. FTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8368</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8368</guid>
		<description>Hi, 
I must say that i absolutely agree w/ you (and Jason as well, but clients wishes is a whole different issue), and i guess that in web studios you can "negotiate" w/ colleagues about the structure of a certain project, but in most agencys the art director has the final word, and it s always something like: "I would like to do something on this page".

Are all art directors like that, basing entire campaigns (both designs and copy) on their personal taste?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I must say that i absolutely agree w/ you (and Jason as well, but clients wishes is a whole different issue), and i guess that in web studios you can &#8220;negotiate&#8221; w/ colleagues about the structure of a certain project, but in most agencys the art director has the final word, and it s always something like: &#8220;I would like to do something on this page&#8221;.</p>
<p>Are all art directors like that, basing entire campaigns (both designs and copy) on their personal taste?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Beaird</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8358</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Beaird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8358</guid>
		<description>Good points, Marko.  As I was reading I couldn't help but think how all this relates to what the client wants.  Then I got down to the comments. :) 

To me, it seems the primary benefit of creating personas would be to convice clients of the need  (or lack thereof) for certain features. After all, they're usally the ones throwing around those first-person pronouns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Marko.  As I was reading I couldn&#8217;t help but think how all this relates to what the client wants.  Then I got down to the comments. :) </p>
<p>To me, it seems the primary benefit of creating personas would be to convice clients of the need  (or lack thereof) for certain features. After all, they&#8217;re usally the ones throwing around those first-person pronouns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medo</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8354</link>
		<dc:creator>Medo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 18:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8354</guid>
		<description>Client-centered design, mmmm ... sometimes can work out ok but more often than not can turn into a real nightmare, especially with clients who don't really understand the web and who tend to assume that the whole world thinks like they do!

I am really going to have some fun tomorrow :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Client-centered design, mmmm &#8230; sometimes can work out ok but more often than not can turn into a real nightmare, especially with clients who don&#8217;t really understand the web and who tend to assume that the whole world thinks like they do!</p>
<p>I am really going to have some fun tomorrow :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marko</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8350</link>
		<dc:creator>marko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 08:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8350</guid>
		<description>That&#8217;s &lt;cite&gt;client-centered design&#153;&lt;/cite&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s <cite>client-centered design&#8482;</cite>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alen</title>
		<link>http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8348</link>
		<dc:creator>Alen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 08:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.maratz.com/blog/archives/2007/09/08/dont-create-features-for-yourself/#comment-8348</guid>
		<description>This could be transfered to clients as well. I had so many unusual requests just because my client or my client's boss wants to see it. At the end we often develop client-centered design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be transfered to clients as well. I had so many unusual requests just because my client or my client&#8217;s boss wants to see it. At the end we often develop client-centered design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
