You’re Not a Programmer, We Won’t Pay You That Much
Occasionally, people ask me to create XHTML/CSS template based on provided .PSDs. Most of the time, such projects are pretty straight-forward – I tell the hourly rate and the estimated hours. The prospective client then accepts the offer or not.
It could be zillion reasons why clients reject offers and I’m used to some neutral (read: polite) arguments, like
“It exceeds our budget” or something like that. However, today I received an interesting response:
“You are a little-bit too expensive, XXX is an hourly rate for a programmer.”
Funny, huh? Or sad?
Why on Earth would anyone compare client-side coding with programming. What is it that people (or just this particular client) think some cog of the same engine should be valued more than others?
Is it because the work of accessibility consultant, CSS coder, SEO engineer or usability expert is not something you can point your finger at? Or is it ‘cause people tend to care for web standards in a way of questionably increased initial exposure on endless, but completely irrelevant CSS showcase lists?…